Network·Verified

PCA

Pastureland Conservation Assessment Studies

USDA’s Conservation Effects Assessment Project (CEAP) is a multi-agency effort led by the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) to quantify the effects of conservation practices across the nation’s working lands.

Visit website·29 papers·5,919 citations·24 views
Impact & evidence below

Mission Evidence Mark

Network Evidence 100
Geographic Coverage 100
Field Depth 50
Practical Value 100
Scholarly Validation 90

Network Evidence Score 89/100

Established evidence

A distributed evidence network, connecting 29 outputs across 14 states.

Publications
29

indexed evidence

Citations
5.9k

scholarly validation

States
14

geographic coverage

Geographic footprint

Where Pastureland Conservation Assessment Studies's research happens

11 county-located studies across 8 counties.

Full county map
Loading county map…
studies
1
2
3
none
Scroll or drag to explore · click a county for its studies

Top counties

Click a county on the map — or a row below — to see its studies.

A study spanning several counties is counted in each. Only county-located studies appear here.

Field-Tested Findings

What this hub's research has shown, in its own words.

Hub Briefing

Hub Description

USDA’s Conservation Effects Assessment Project (CEAP) is a multi-agency effort led by the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) to quantify the effects of conservation practices across the nation’s working lands.

Evidence Depth

29

total papers

Funding Base

15

unique funders

Local Fit

14 states

geographic coverage

Actionability

100%

papers with outcomes or takeaways

Key Topics

Recent Papers

R. Daren Harmel, Devendra Amatya, Stephen Sebestyen et al.

The natural background contribution from grasslands and forest lands is important to consider in research and management. To our knowledge, no study has compiled and analyzed this “reference” water quality from small natural grasslands and forests. Thus, our objective was to summarize nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), and sediment loads in runoff fromthese referencewatersheds.Measured annual nutrient loadswere compiled from 13 grassland and nine forest reference sites across 12 North American regions.

20260DOI

Merilynn C. Schantz, Douglas R. Smith, Kabindra Adhikari et al.

This study successfully evaluated soil health differences between alternative and prevailing grazing strategies, revealing distinct nutrient dynamics and carbon trends. Additionally, it demonstrated the importance of soil extraction methods in assessing nutrient abundance, particularly for P, which has implications for environmental management and water quality.

20262DOI

Merilynn C. Schantz, Douglas R. Smith, Kabindra Adhikari et al.

Soil health and nutrient dynamics in pasturelands: A decadal study on the effects of alternative grazing management.

20252DOI

Amber Dalke, Jason W. Karl, Jeremy Kenyon et al.

RangeDocs (https://docs.rangelandsgateway.org) allows Extension professionals, agency staff, producers, and other land managers to search rangeland terms and pinpoint applicable information from key national and regional rangeland resources

20250DOI

Merilynn C. Schantz, Douglas R. Smith, Kabindra Adhikari et al.

Adapting to Climatic Extremes: Do Grazing Management Strategies Matter?.

20252DOI

Follow this hub

Get a weekly update with new evidence from this hub.

Hub: Pastureland Conservation Assessment Studies

Most Cited Paper

Strategic Snapshot

Primary topic: Grazing

Primary outcome: Other / Neutral

Top funder concentration: 14%

Visit website

Top Contributors

1. R. Daren Harmel

6 citations

4 papers

2. Merilynn C. Schantz

6 citations

3 papers

3. Douglas R. Smith

6 citations

3 papers

4. Kabindra Adhikari

6 citations

3 papers

5. Javier M. Osorio Leyton

6 citations

3 papers
Put This Hub on Your SiteOne responsive Hub Card with current evidence and trusted co-branding.
Pastureland Conservation Assessment Studies Hub Card — evidence partnership with OpenAgData

The 420×180 card scales down responsively and updates automatically when the evidence score, indexed-work count, or approved hub identity changes.

<a href="https://open-ag-data.com/hub/pastureland-conservation-assessment-studies"><img src="https://open-ag-data.com/hub/pastureland-conservation-assessment-studies/widget?variant=card&v=3&credit=partner" alt="Pastureland Conservation Assessment Studies Hub Card — evidence partnership with OpenAgData" width="420" height="180" style="max-width:100%;height:auto" /></a>
Download PNG