Montana Wheat and Barley Committee
The Montana Wheat and Barley Committee is a producer-funded and producer-directed checkoff organization that has supported local research and global market development since 1967. This hub tracks published work tied to its research investments, including wheat stem sawfly resistance, solid-stem breeding, grain quality, and dryland cropping systems in the Northern Great Plains.
- Published works in the record
- 16
- Citations to those works
- 169
- Measured results, quoted from the papers
- 32
- States with indexed work
- 2
Reports use the public sample. Complete portfolio reporting is available through a paid hub partnership.
Represent this organization? Explore a hub partnershipThe five questions a board asks
Who was funded, on what, where, and what came of it.
Sources and limits for these answers
Each answer says what it is built from. Public records answer part of each question; the funder's own project list and reports complete it.
- Who received the funding
- 27 awards from the funder's own records, 2024 · 2 institutions
- What it was spent on
- 27 projects from the funder's award records, 2024; amounts not recorded Varietal Development leads with 30% of projects. Completes it: Award amounts and the priority area of each project.
- Where the work happened
- 6 counties · 1 state; sites read from methods sections, never from an address
- What came out of it
- 5 journal articles · 2019–2023 32 measured findings from 11 sources, each quoted from its source; not yet checked by a reviewer.
- What to fund next
- One year of records; the gaps appear once earlier years are added Completes it: The full award history, so a blank year reads as a real gap rather than a missing listing.
What the measurements showed
32 findings · 11 source papers · each quoted from its source; not yet checked by a reviewer
3-day heat treatment (33c/26c day/night) in growth chamber vs Control temperature (23C/16C day/night)
non-photochemical quenching (NPQ) induction from chlorophyll fluorescence imaging · 1 source paper · 1 finding
3-day heat treatment (33c/26c day/night) in growth chamber vs Control temperature (23C/16C day/night)
non-photochemical quenching (NPQ) induction from chlorophyll fluorescence imaging · 1 source paper · 1 finding
barley
Reported directions across source papers
0 increase · 0 reported no change · 1 decrease · 0 mixed · 0 unknown
Each identified paper counts once in this comparison. Mixed means its measurements differ in direction; unknown means some direction is missing. Counts do not measure effect size or establish which practice is best.
3-day heat treatment (33c/26c day/night) in growth chamber vs Control temperature (23C/16C day/night)
leaf chlorophyll content (SPAD) · 1 source paper · 1 finding
3-day heat treatment (33c/26c day/night) in growth chamber vs Control temperature (23C/16C day/night)
leaf chlorophyll content (SPAD) · 1 source paper · 1 finding
barley
Reported directions across source papers
0 increase · 0 reported no change · 1 decrease · 0 mixed · 0 unknown
Each identified paper counts once in this comparison. Mixed means its measurements differ in direction; unknown means some direction is missing. Counts do not measure effect size or establish which practice is best.
Cannibalism (antixenosis-driven) vs Presence of all other mortality causes
C. cinctus mortality · 1 source paper · 1 finding
Cannibalism (antixenosis-driven) vs Presence of all other mortality causes
C. cinctus mortality · 1 source paper · 1 finding
barley
Reported directions across source papers
1 increase · 0 reported no change · 0 decrease · 0 mixed · 0 unknown
Each identified paper counts once in this comparison. Mixed means its measurements differ in direction; unknown means some direction is missing. Counts do not measure effect size or establish which practice is best.
Rht-B1b semi-dwarfing allele vs Rht-B1a (standard height) NIL
grain protein · 1 source paper · 1 finding
Rht-B1b semi-dwarfing allele vs Rht-B1a (standard height) NIL
grain protein · 1 source paper · 1 finding
wheat
Reported directions across source papers
0 increase · 0 reported no change · 1 decrease · 0 mixed · 0 unknown
Each identified paper counts once in this comparison. Mixed means its measurements differ in direction; unknown means some direction is missing. Counts do not measure effect size or establish which practice is best.
Extended grain fill cultivars (Buzz, MT Endurance) vs Hockett (standard grain fill cultivar)
grain protein concentration · 1 source paper · 1 finding
Extended grain fill cultivars (Buzz, MT Endurance) vs Hockett (standard grain fill cultivar)
grain protein concentration · 1 source paper · 1 finding
barley
Reported directions across source papers
0 increase · 0 reported no change · 1 decrease · 0 mixed · 0 unknown
Each identified paper counts once in this comparison. Mixed means its measurements differ in direction; unknown means some direction is missing. Counts do not measure effect size or establish which practice is best.
Cover crop termination method vs Other termination methods
microbial community beta diversity · 1 source paper · 1 finding
Cover crop termination method vs Other termination methods
microbial community beta diversity · 1 source paper · 1 finding
Crop not specified
Reported directions across source papers
0 increase · 1 reported no change · 0 decrease · 0 mixed · 0 unknown
Each identified paper counts once in this comparison. Mixed means its measurements differ in direction; unknown means some direction is missing. Counts do not measure effect size or establish which practice is best.
Commodity board · Managed hubs
Bring your research investment into the next board discussion.
Connect funded projects, publications and measured outcomes in a managed hub your board and producers can explore.
- Trace investment to research
- Keep results tied to sources
- Prepare stakeholder updates
- Works indexed for Montana Wheat and Barley Committee
- 16
- Shown in this public view
- 5
- Partner view
- 11 more works, county map, measured findings, board report
What happens next.
- 1A 30-minute conversation
Your goals, who needs the evidence, and how you report today.
- 2A preview of your own portfolio
Built from public records under a private link, free, before any decision.
- 3Scope agreed before work begins
You decide what is worth maintaining. Fees follow the agreed scope.
Prefer email? Write to hello@open-ag-data.com. You hear back from Saurav Das, the founder, within two business days.
Ongoing curation, reporting and custom capabilities are part of a paid hub partnership, with scope and fees agreed before work begins.
What your records would add to this page
This page is built from public records. With Montana Wheat and Barley Committee's project list, amounts and final reports we map the whole history: who was funded, on what, where, what came of it, and what to fund next.
- Project list with investigator and institution per award
Mapped · Who received the funding, every year - Award amounts and priority area per project
Unlocks · Funding by area and year, in dollars - Award history across years
Unlocks · Real gaps by area and year, not missing listings - Final reports per project
Mapped · Outputs tied to each project, and measured results with their conditions - Trial sites, stations and partner farms
Mapped · A county map of where the work happened
Sources & coverage About the indexed collection
About this indexed collection
- 16
- Publications indexed
- 5
- Publications in this view
This public sample shows part of the indexed collection. Indexed record counts are not counts of independent experiments or measured findings. Coverage reflects the records linked here, not all of the organization’s research.