Regional Research Funder·Est. 1967·Verified

Montana Wheat and Barley Committee logo

Montana Wheat and Barley Committee

Wheat and barley research, grain quality, wheat stem sawfly, and dryland cropping systems

The Montana Wheat and Barley Committee is a producer-funded and producer-directed checkoff organization that has supported local research and global market development since 1967. This hub tracks published work tied to its research investments, including wheat stem sawfly resistance, solid-stem breeding, grain quality, and dryland cropping systems in the Northern Great Plains.

Great Falls, Montana·Visit website·14 indexed funded works·155 scholarly citations

Downloads free as a sample edition · the complete report is part of the hub partnership

Portfolio & impact below

Portfolio Evidence Mark

Indexed Works 89
Verified Open Links 100
Producer Summaries 0
Local Detail 100
Funding Attribution 100

Portfolio Visibility Score 77/100

Established evidence

One open portfolio of MWBC-funded research, spanning 14 indexed works and 155 scholarly citations.

Indexed Works
14

funded outputs in OpenAgData

Open Links
14/14

verified public links

Citations
155

scholarly validation

Next unlock — producer summaries: Add outcomes, takeaways, and field context so the research becomes easier to use.

Hub Partner Program

Own Montana Wheat and Barley Committee? Make this hub work for you.

Partner for a branded page, Local Fit modeling, curated portfolio indexing, and an impact dashboard that shows funders the geographic reach and funding context behind your work.

Bring this hub on board $15,000 per year

Geographic footprint

Where Montana Wheat and Barley Committee funds research

5 studies include a mappable location. Together they land in 6 counties, all in Montana.

Full county map
Loading county map…
studies
1
2
3
none
Scroll or drag to explore · click a county for its studies

Top counties

Click a county on the map — or a row below — to see its studies.

A study spanning several counties is counted in each. Only county-located studies appear here.

Hub Briefing

Hub Description

The Montana Wheat and Barley Committee is a producer-funded and producer-directed checkoff organization that has supported local research and global market development since 1967. This hub tracks published work tied to its research investments, including wheat stem sawfly resistance, solid-stem breeding, grain quality, and dryland cropping systems in the Northern Great Plains.

Indexed Funded Works

14

attributed works currently indexed

Co-funding Partners

0

other funders represented

Local Evidence

1 state

geographic coverage

Producer Summaries

0/14

works with producer-facing summaries

Key Topics

Recent Papers

Jennifer Lachowiec, James E. Berg, Meng Liang et al.

Abstract Producers desire cultivars that consistently perform with high yields and end‐use qualities. Unlike easily recognized average yield improvements, yield stability over time is less examined, especially when considering the role of breeding relative to other factors like management and changing climatic conditions. Our study system was a 70‐year historical dataset from which we estimated the year‐over‐year stability of winter wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars released by Montana's Agricultural Experimental Station. We examined yield stability within six locations representing diverse growing conditions across Montana and found no evidence that breeding has improved stability, that stability may be decreasing over time at one location, and that the year‐over‐year stability of a cultivar is sensitive to location. We examined the role of climatic conditions, including temperature, and rainfall to understand if increased climatic variability was masking improved patterns of stability. However, the lack of impact of breeding remained. These findings suggest that Montana's winter wheat may benefit from selective breeding for increased stability within locations.

20235DOI

Jed O. Eberly, Maryse Bourgault, Julia M. Dafo et al.

The incorporation of cover crops into cropping systems is important for enhancing soil health in agricultural systems. Soil microbes contribute to soil health by supplying key nutrients and providing protection against plant pests, diseases, and abiotic stress. While research has demonstrated the connection between cover crops and the soil microbiology, less is known regarding the impact of cover crops on the soil microbial community in semi-arid regions of the Northern Great Plains. Our objectives were to evaluate changes in the soil bacterial community composition and community networks in wheat grown after multi-species cover crops. Cover crops were compared to continuous cropping and crop/fallow systems and the effects of cover crop termination methods were also evaluated. Cover crops consisted of a cool season multispecies mix, mid-season multispecies mix, and a warm season multispecies mix, which were grown in rotation with winter wheat. A continuous cropping (wheat/barley) and wheat/fallow system were also included along with cover crop termination by grazing, herbicide application, and haying. Cover crop treatments and termination methods had no significant impact on microbial community alpha diversity. Cover crop termination methods also had no significant impact on microbial community beta diversity. Families belonging to the phyla Actinobacteria, Bacterioidota, and Proteobacteria were more abundant in the cool season cover crop treatment compared to the warm season cover crop treatment. Co-occurrence network analysis indicated that incorporation of cool season cover crops or mid-season mixes in a wheat-based cropping system led to greater complexity and connectivity within these microbial networks compared to the other treatments which suggests these communities may be more resilient to environmental disturbances.

20228DOI

Maryse Bourgault, Samuel A. Wyffels, Julia M Dafoe et al.

Abstract The introduction of cover crops as fallow replacement in the traditional cereal-based cropping system of the Northern Great Plains has the potential to decrease soil erosion, increase water infiltration, reduce weed pressure and improve soil health. However, there are concerns this might come at the cost of reduced production in the subsequent wheat crop due to soil water use by the cover crops. To determine this risk, a phased 2-year rotation of 15 different cover crop mixtures and winter wheat/spring wheat was established at the Northern Agricultural Research Center near Havre, MT from 2012 to 2020, or four rotation cycles. Controls included fallow–wheat and barley–wheat sequences. Cover crops and barley were terminated early July by haying, grazing or herbicide application. Yields were significantly decreased in wheat following cover crops in 3 out of 8 years, up to maximum of 1.4 t ha −1 (or 60%) for winter wheat following cool-season cover crop mixtures. However, cover crops also unexpectedly increased following wheat yields in 2018, possibly due in part to residual fertilizer. Within cool-, mid- and warm-season cover crop groups, individual mixtures did not show significant differences impact on following grain yields. Similarly, cover crop termination methods had no impact on spring or winter wheat grain yields in any of the 8 years considered. Wheat grain protein concentration was not affected by cover crop mixtures or termination treatments but was decreased in winter wheat following barley. Differences in soil water content across cover crop groups were only evident at the beginning of the third cycle in one field, but important reductions were observed below 15 cm in the last rotation cycle. In-season rainfall explained 43 and 13% of the variability in winter and spring wheat yields, respectively, compared to 2 and 1% for the previous year cover crop biomass. Further economic analyses are required to determine if the integration of livestock is necessary to mitigate the risks associated with the introduction of cover crops in replacement of fallow in the Northern Great Plains.

20219DOI

Buddhi B Achhami, Robert K. D. Peterson, Jamie Sherman et al.

Accurately estimating cause-specific mortality for immature insect herbivores is usually difficult. The insects are exposed to abiotic and biotic mortality factors, causing cadavers to simply disappear before cause of mortality can be recorded. Also, insect herbivores are often highly mobile on hosts, making it difficult to follow patterns for individuals through time. In contrast, the wheat stem sawfly, Cephus cinctus Norton, spends its entire egg, larval, and pupal period inside a host stem. Therefore, with periodic sampling stage-specific causes of mortality can be ascertained. Consequently, we examined C. cinctus mortality in eight barley, Hordeum vulgare L., cultivars in two locations in Montana from 2016 to 2018 by collecting stem samples from stem elongation to crop maturity at weekly intervals, and collecting overwintered barley stubs the following spring and summer from the same plots. If larvae were present, we examined larval status-dead or alive-and categorized dead individuals into one of 5 mortality categories: plant defense, cannibalism, parasitism, pathogens, and unknown factors. We used multiple decrement life tables to estimate cause-specific mortality and irreplaceable mortality (the proportion of mortality from a given cause that cannot be replaced by other causes of mortality). Plant defense (antibiosis) caused 85.7 ± 3.6%, cannibalism (governed by antixenosis) caused 70.1 ± 7.6%, parasitism caused 13.8 ± 5.9%, unknown factors caused 38.5 ± 7.6%, and pathogens caused 14.7 ± 8.5% mortality in the presence of all causes of mortality. Similarly, irreplaceable mortality due to plant defense was 22.3 ± 6.4%, cannibalism was 29.1± 4.2%, unknown factors was 6.2 ± 1.8%, pathogens was 0.9 ± 0.5%, and parasitism was 1. 5 ± 0. 6%. Antibiosis traits primarily killed newly emerged larvae, while other traits supported more favorable oviposition decisions by females, increasing mortality by obligate cannibalism. Our results suggest that breeding barley for resistance to C. cinctus targeting both categories of traits (antibiosis and antixenosis) is a highly valuable tactic for management of this important pest.

20209DOI

Emma M. Jobson, Rachel E. Johnston, Alanna J. Oiestad et al.

The Reduced Height (Rht) genes formed the basis for the green revolution in wheat by decreasing plant height and increasing productive tillers. There are two current widely used Rht mutant alleles, Rht-B1b and Rht-D1b. Both reduce plant height by 20% and increase seed yield by 5-10%. They are also associated with decreased seed size and protein content. Here we tested the degree to which Rht-B1b impacts flag leaf photosynthetic rates and carbon and nitrogen partitioning to the flag leaf and grain during grain fill under field conditions using near isogenic lines (NILs) that were either standard height (Rht-B1a) or semi-dwarf (Rht-B1b). The results demonstrate that at anthesis, Rht-B1b reduces flag leaf photosynthetic rate per unit area by 18% and chlorophyll A content by 23%. Rht-B1b significantly reduced grain protein beginning at 14 days post anthesis with the greatest difference seen at 21 days post anthesis (DPA) (12%). Rht-B1b also significantly decreased individual seed weight beginning at 21 DPA and by 15.2% at 28 DPA. Global expression analysis using RNA extracted from developing leaves and stems demonstrated that genes associated with carbon and nitrogen metabolism are not substantially altered by Rht-B1b. From this study, we conclude that Rht-B1b reduces flag leaf photosynthetic rate at flowering while changes in grain composition begin shortly after anthesis.

201982DOI

Follow this hub

Get a weekly update with new evidence from this hub.

Hub: Montana Wheat and Barley Committee

Most Cited Paper

Strategic Snapshot

Primary topic: Biology

Primary outcome: Outcome profile unavailable

Producer-ready summaries: 0/14

Funded research spans: 2019–2023

Established 1967

Visit website

Top Contributors

1. Maryse Bourgault

17 citations

2 papers

2. Samuel A. Wyffels

17 citations

2 papers

3. P. F. Lamb

17 citations

2 papers

4. Darrin L Boss

17 citations

2 papers

5. Emma M. Jobson

82 citations

1 paper
Put This Hub on Your SiteOne responsive Hub Card with current evidence and trusted co-branding.
Montana Wheat and Barley Committee Hub Card — research featured on OpenAgData

The 420×180 card scales down responsively and updates automatically when the evidence score, indexed-work count, or approved hub identity changes.

<a href="https://open-ag-data.com/hub/montana-wheat-and-barley-committee"><img src="https://open-ag-data.com/hub/montana-wheat-and-barley-committee/widget?variant=card&v=3" alt="Montana Wheat and Barley Committee Hub Card — research featured on OpenAgData" width="420" height="180" style="max-width:100%;height:auto" /></a>
Download PNG