National Soil Dynamics Laboratory logo
Government research lab

National Soil Dynamics Laboratory

The National Soil Dynamics Laboratory is a USDA Agricultural Research Service laboratory on the Auburn University campus, founded in 1933. Its research develops tools and practices for sustainable, profitable production, with emphasis on conservation systems, soil compaction and machinery interactions, organic waste management, and soil carbon responses to environmental change.

Auburn, Alabama · organizationOfficial website Established 1933Updated Apr 9, 2026
Published works in the record
3
Citations to those works
32
Measured results, quoted from the papers
13
Where the indexed work is
Alabama

Reports use the public sample. Complete portfolio reporting is available through a paid hub partnership.

Represent this organization? Explore a hub partnership

Five questions a funder or collaborator asks

What it studies, who does it, where, what it found, and who funds it.

Sources and limits for these answers

Each answer says what it is built from. Public records answer part of each question; the organization's own project and member lists complete it.

What it studies
3 themes across 3 records, 2012–2022 Cover Crops appears most often (3 records).
Who does the work
Counted from the author lists of 3 records; authors include outside collaborators Completes it: The group's own member list, so members and outside collaborators read apart.
Where the work happens
3 papers name a state only; a state is not a trial site Completes it: Site lists from the group's projects. An institution's address is not a study site.
What it found
From 3 sources among 3 outputs, each quoted from its source; not yet checked by a reviewer
Who funds it
From the funding statements of 2 of 3 records; a statement names a funder, not an amount USDA-ARS is named most often (2 records). Completes it: The group's own award list, with amounts and years.

Evidence for the next decision

What the research found

Read the result, understand its limits, and follow the evidence to its source.

Summaries from the research index

These takeaways are a starting point. They do not replace reviewed measurements, methods or institutional attribution.

Indexed research summary

Influence of Recurrent Rolling/Crimping of a Cereal Rye/Crimson Clover Cover Crop on No-Till Bush Bean Yield

A no-till experiment was conducted in Auburn, AL U.S.A. to evaluate the effectiveness of an experimental two-stage roller/crimper in reoccurring rolling over the same area planted with a cereal rye-crimson clover cover crop mix and its influence on bush bean yield.

Indexed research summary

Management of High-Residue Cover Crops in a Conservation Tillage Organic Vegetable On-Farm Setting

A three year on-farm conservation-tillage experiment was initiated in fall of 2008 at Randle Farm LLC, located in Auburn, AL.

Indexed research summary

Roller Type and Operating Speed Effects on Rye Termination Rates, Soil Moisture, and Yield of Sweet Corn in a No-till System

A field experiment was conducted in Cullman, AL, to evaluate the effects of three different rollers/crimpers on the termination of a winter cover crop, soil moisture, and yield of sweet corn in a no-till system.

What the measurements showed

13 findings · 3 source papers · each quoted from its source; not yet checked by a reviewer

Reported measurements in this hub’s indexed research. Open a comparison to inspect reported directions and context.

Year/weather variation vs Across years 2006-2008

sweet corn yield · 1 source paper · 1 finding

sweet corn

Reported directions across source papers

0 increase · 0 reported no change · 1 decrease · 0 mixed · 0 unknown

Each identified paper counts once in this comparison. Mixed means its measurements differ in direction; unknown means some direction is missing. Counts do not measure effect size or establish which practice is best.

Roller/crimper (no herbicide) vs Smooth drum roller plus glyphosate (100% termination)

rye termination rate · 1 source paper · 1 finding

rye cover crop

Reported directions across source papers

0 increase · 0 reported no change · 1 decrease · 0 mixed · 0 unknown

Each identified paper counts once in this comparison. Mixed means its measurements differ in direction; unknown means some direction is missing. Counts do not measure effect size or establish which practice is best.

No-till with cover crops vs Conventional tillage system

yield (cantaloupe, okra, watermelon) · 1 source paper · 1 finding

cantaloupe, okra, watermelon

Reported directions across source papers

0 increase · 0 reported no change · 1 decrease · 0 mixed · 0 unknown

Each identified paper counts once in this comparison. Mixed means its measurements differ in direction; unknown means some direction is missing. Counts do not measure effect size or establish which practice is best.

Rolling treatments (various) vs Between rolling treatments

cover crop termination rate · 1 source paper · 1 finding

cereal rye/crimson clover cover crop

Reported directions across source papers

0 increase · 1 reported no change · 0 decrease · 0 mixed · 0 unknown

Each identified paper counts once in this comparison. Mixed means its measurements differ in direction; unknown means some direction is missing. Counts do not measure effect size or establish which practice is best.

Roller operating speed vs 3.2 km·h−1 vs. 6.4 km·h−1

sweet corn yield · 1 source paper · 1 finding

sweet corn

Reported directions across source papers

0 increase · 1 reported no change · 0 decrease · 0 mixed · 0 unknown

Each identified paper counts once in this comparison. Mixed means its measurements differ in direction; unknown means some direction is missing. Counts do not measure effect size or establish which practice is best.

Glyphosate plus rolling vs Roller alone treatments

sweet corn yield · 1 source paper · 1 finding

sweet corn

Reported directions across source papers

0 increase · 0 reported no change · 1 decrease · 0 mixed · 0 unknown

Each identified paper counts once in this comparison. Mixed means its measurements differ in direction; unknown means some direction is missing. Counts do not measure effect size or establish which practice is best.

Showing 6 of 13 comparisons. Source papers may share experiments; these are not counts of independent trials. Each finding receives equal weight in a finding median.

Government research lab · Managed hubs

Help funders and collaborators understand your lab’s work.

Connect your research questions, methods and publications to findings and field context in one maintained research hub.

  • Explain your research focus
  • Keep methods with findings
  • Support partner conversations
Works indexed for National Soil Dynamics Laboratory
3
Shown in this public view
3
Partner view
county map, measured findings, board report
See a complete partner hub: American Malting Barley Association131 indexed works, 198 measured findings, study sites in 12 states

What happens next.

  1. 1
    A 30-minute conversation

    Your goals, who needs the evidence, and how you report today.

  2. 2
    A preview of your own portfolio

    Built from public records under a private link, free, before any decision.

  3. 3
    Scope agreed before work begins

    You decide what is worth maintaining. Fees follow the agreed scope.

Explore plans & pricing

Prefer email? Write to hello@open-ag-data.com. You hear back from Saurav Das, the founder, within two business days.

Ongoing curation, reporting and custom capabilities are part of a paid hub partnership, with scope and fees agreed before work begins.

Sources & coverage About the indexed collection

About this indexed collection

3
Publications indexed
3
Publications in this view

Indexed record counts are not counts of independent experiments or measured findings. Coverage reflects the records linked here, not all of the organization’s research.