Southern Soybean Research Program
The Southern Soybean Research Program coordinates soybean-checkoff-funded production research across Alabama, Kentucky, North Carolina, Tennessee, and Texas and is managed by the Kentucky Soybean Board. This hub tracks published work connected to member-board investments in disease and nematode management, irrigation and drought, variety performance, weed control, and other priorities shared across the Southern soybean region.
- Published works in the record
- 11
- Citations to those works
- 100
- Measured results, quoted from the papers
- 9
- States with indexed work
- 2
Reports use the public sample. Complete portfolio reporting is available through a paid hub partnership.
Represent this organization? Explore a hub partnershipThe five questions a board asks
Who was funded, on what, where, and what came of it.
Sources and limits for these answers
Each answer says what it is built from. Public records answer part of each question; the funder's own project list and reports complete it.
- Who received the funding
- Counted from publication author lists; authorship is not an award record Completes it: A project list naming the investigator and institution on each award.
- What it was spent on
- 20 theme tags across the 5 records in this view, since a record can carry several; themes describe what was published, not what was funded Completes it: Award amounts and the priority area of each project.
- Where the work happened
- 9 counties · 2 states; sites read from methods sections, never from an address
- What came out of it
- 5 journal articles · 2022–2026 9 measured findings from 4 sources, 1 checked by a reviewer so far.
- What to fund next
- Publication record only; where the funder's money went is not known from this Completes it: The full award history, so a blank year reads as a real gap rather than a missing listing.
What the measurements showed
9 findings · 4 source papers · 1 checked by a reviewer so far
Dicamba applied to weeds <10 cm tall vs Labeled rate application
Palmer amaranth control · 1 source paper · 1 finding
Dicamba applied to weeds <10 cm tall vs Labeled rate application
Palmer amaranth control · 1 source paper · 1 finding
cotton/soybean
Reported directions across source papers
0 increase · 0 reported no change · 0 decrease · 0 mixed · 1 unknown
Each identified paper counts once in this comparison. Mixed means its measurements differ in direction; unknown means some direction is missing. Counts do not measure effect size or establish which practice is best.
Clethodim + dicamba mixture vs Clethodim alone
junglerice control · 1 source paper · 1 finding
Clethodim + dicamba mixture vs Clethodim alone
junglerice control · 1 source paper · 1 finding
junglerice (weed)
Reported directions across source papers
0 increase · 0 reported no change · 1 decrease · 0 mixed · 0 unknown
Each identified paper counts once in this comparison. Mixed means its measurements differ in direction; unknown means some direction is missing. Counts do not measure effect size or establish which practice is best.
Drift reduction agent (DRA) added to dicamba mixtures vs Dicamba mixtures without DRA
junglerice control · 1 source paper · 1 finding
Drift reduction agent (DRA) added to dicamba mixtures vs Dicamba mixtures without DRA
junglerice control · 1 source paper · 1 finding
junglerice (weed)
Reported directions across source papers
0 increase · 0 reported no change · 1 decrease · 0 mixed · 0 unknown
Each identified paper counts once in this comparison. Mixed means its measurements differ in direction; unknown means some direction is missing. Counts do not measure effect size or establish which practice is best.
2,4-D choline vs 2,4-D amine application vs 2,4-D amine vs 2,4-D choline
vapor emissions · 1 source paper · 1 finding
2,4-D choline vs 2,4-D amine application vs 2,4-D amine vs 2,4-D choline
vapor emissions · 1 source paper · 1 finding
Crop not specified
Reported directions across source papers
0 increase · 1 reported no change · 0 decrease · 0 mixed · 0 unknown
Each identified paper counts once in this comparison. Mixed means its measurements differ in direction; unknown means some direction is missing. Counts do not measure effect size or establish which practice is best.
Glyphosate + dicamba mixture vs Glyphosate alone
junglerice control · 1 source paper · 1 finding
Glyphosate + dicamba mixture vs Glyphosate alone
junglerice control · 1 source paper · 1 finding
junglerice (weed)
Reported directions across source papers
0 increase · 0 reported no change · 1 decrease · 0 mixed · 0 unknown
Each identified paper counts once in this comparison. Mixed means its measurements differ in direction; unknown means some direction is missing. Counts do not measure effect size or establish which practice is best.
TTI nozzle application vs AIXR nozzle
junglerice control · 1 source paper · 1 finding
TTI nozzle application vs AIXR nozzle
junglerice control · 1 source paper · 1 finding
junglerice (weed)
Reported directions across source papers
0 increase · 0 reported no change · 1 decrease · 0 mixed · 0 unknown
Each identified paper counts once in this comparison. Mixed means its measurements differ in direction; unknown means some direction is missing. Counts do not measure effect size or establish which practice is best.
Commodity research program · Managed hubs
Bring your research investment into the next board discussion.
Connect funded projects, publications and measured outcomes in a managed hub your board and producers can explore.
- Trace investment to research
- Keep results tied to sources
- Prepare stakeholder updates
- Works indexed for Southern Soybean Research Program
- 11
- Shown in this public view
- 5
- Partner view
- 6 more works, county map, measured findings, board report
What happens next.
- 1A 30-minute conversation
Your goals, who needs the evidence, and how you report today.
- 2A preview of your own portfolio
Built from public records under a private link, free, before any decision.
- 3Scope agreed before work begins
You decide what is worth maintaining. Fees follow the agreed scope.
Prefer email? Write to hello@open-ag-data.com. You hear back from Saurav Das, the founder, within two business days.
Ongoing curation, reporting and custom capabilities are part of a paid hub partnership, with scope and fees agreed before work begins.
What your records would add to this page
This page is built from public records. With Southern Soybean Research Program's project list, amounts and final reports we map the whole history: who was funded, on what, where, what came of it, and what to fund next.
- Project list with investigator and institution per award
Unlocks · Who received the funding, every year - Award amounts and priority area per project
Unlocks · Funding by area and year, in dollars - Award history across years
Unlocks · Real gaps by area and year, not missing listings - Final reports per project
Unlocks · Outputs tied to each project, and measured results with their conditions - Trial sites, stations and partner farms
Mapped · A county map of where the work happened
Sources & coverage About the indexed collection
About this indexed collection
- 11
- Publications indexed
- 5
- Publications in this view
This public sample shows part of the indexed collection. Indexed record counts are not counts of independent experiments or measured findings. Coverage reflects the records linked here, not all of the organization’s research.