Southern Soybean Research Program logo
Commodity research program

Southern Soybean Research Program

The Southern Soybean Research Program coordinates soybean-checkoff-funded production research across Alabama, Kentucky, North Carolina, Tennessee, and Texas and is managed by the Kentucky Soybean Board. This hub tracks published work connected to member-board investments in disease and nematode management, irrigation and drought, variety performance, weed control, and other priorities shared across the Southern soybean region.

Southern United States · organizationOfficial website

Reports use the public sample. Complete portfolio reporting is available through a paid hub partnership.

Represent this organization? Explore a hub partnership

Institutional impact · source-linked evidence

See the work behind the impact.

What Southern Soybean Research Program supports, what the research reports, and the questions to explore next.

Publications indexed
11

5 available in this view

Citations recorded
88

Scholarly attention, not farm benefit

States tagged in the index
2

Field-site precision varies

Measured findings indexed
1

Separate from publication counts

These are indicators of the indexed research record. They do not measure institutional quality or economic return.

Evidence for the next decision

What the research found

Read the result, understand its limits, and follow the evidence to its source.

Measured results need a closer review.

Indexed publications are a starting point. Treatment comparisons, original measurements and study conditions need to be connected before this hub can demonstrate a field outcome.

Commodity research program · Managed hubs

Bring your research investment into the next board discussion.

Connect funded projects, publications and measured outcomes in a managed hub your board and producers can explore.

  • Trace investment to research
  • Keep results tied to sources
  • Prepare stakeholder updates

Start with your goals.

Discuss your mission, audience and current workflow. We’ll explore how a managed hub could support them.

Explore plans & pricing

Ongoing curation, reporting and custom capabilities are part of a paid hub partnership, with scope and fees agreed before work begins.

What the measurements showed

1 findings · 1 source paper · 1 findings confirmed by a reviewer

Reported measurements in indexed research funded by Southern Soybean Research Program. Open a comparison to inspect reported directions and context.

GmSAMT1 overexpression vs Nontransgenic control soybean

SCN development (HG type 0/race 3) · 1 source paper · 1 finding

soybean

Reported directions across source papers

0 increase · 0 reported no change · 1 decrease · 0 mixed · 0 unknown

Each identified paper counts once in this comparison. Mixed means its measurements differ in direction; unknown means some direction is missing. Counts do not measure effect size or establish which practice is best.

Showing 1 of 1 comparisons. Source papers may share experiments; these are not counts of independent trials. Each finding receives equal weight in a finding median.

Research priorities

Topics in the 5-record visible sample

Biology4
Agronomy4
Dicamba3
Amaranth2
Environmental Science2
Glyphosate2

Topics can overlap. Counts describe the available collection, not spending or achieved benefits.

Five questions for the board

Start with the decision your team needs to make.

1What did the investment make possible?

Prove the value of producer investments. Trace reported funding, projects and measured results. Keep economic returns separate from research activity.

Attributable producer benefits and independent evaluation are needed to establish return on investment.

2Where should the next research dollar go?

Allocate limited research funding. Compare the portfolio across priorities, time horizons and project stages.

Budgets, costs, competing proposals and board priorities are needed before recommending an allocation.

3Who is working on the question?

Coordinate research and identify gaps. Find investigators, named funders and existing research. Similar titles alone do not establish duplication.

A shared active-project inventory is needed to distinguish a real gap from work not yet published.

4Does the finding apply in this place?

Make research useful on local farms. Connect published findings to actual study locations, soil, weather, methods and management.

Local applicability needs comparable conditions and advisor or extension review; a nearby point is not a recommendation.

5Which research could help with the next risk?

Navigate market and weather uncertainty. Inspect evidence about input efficiency, alternative uses and adaptation options.

Research evidence can inform these questions. It does not establish market demand, predict prices or prevent weather losses.

Explore the research behind this hub

5 records available in this view · 11 indexed overall

Taynara Possebom, Dominic Duane Reisig · 2026 · North Carolina
Delaney C. Foster, Thomas C. Mueller · 2024 · Tennessee
Eric A. L. Jones, Ryan J. Andres · 2023 · North Carolina
Sources & coverage About the indexed collection

About this indexed collection

11
Publications indexed
5
Publications in this view

This public sample shows part of the indexed collection. Indexed record counts are not counts of independent experiments or measured findings. Coverage reflects the records linked here, not all of the organization’s research.