Results quoted from your papers
Are these right?
OpenAgData quotes measured results from papers so that a reader can see what was tested, what was measured and which way it went. These are the 3 results drawn from your paper. You measured them; nobody is better placed to say whether we read them correctly.
Mark a result Right and it is shown as confirmed by its author. Mark it Not right and it comes off the public page until it has been corrected from the paper.
Opened without an author's link. What you mark goes to a reviewer first.Sustainable aviation fuel production from Brassica carinata in the Southern United States
2021 · 3 results quoted
carinata and winter wheat planting over 36% of watershed area vs scenario without carinata/wheat planting
total sediment, mineral phosphorus, and nitrate loads · carinata, winter wheatLower50 %
“When carinata and winter wheat were planted over 36% of the total watershed area, reduction in total sediment, mineral phosphorus, and nitrate loads ranged between 11.5% and 50.0%.” abstract
carinata winter cover crop vs winter fallow
weed emergence · summer crops following carinataLower25 %
“the authors reported that carinata reduced the emergence of common weeds by more than 25% compared to winter fallow without using herbicides.” abstract
carinata-based sustainable aviation fuel vs conventional aviation fuel (2618 g CO2e/L)
carbon emissions relative to conventional fuelLower65 %
“This estimate provided a 65% relative carbon savings compared with conventional aviation fuel (2618 g CO2e/L) at the airport.” abstract
This page was opened without an author's link, so what you mark here goes to a reviewer first and changes nothing on the public page until they have looked.
These are the results the index extracted from each paper's text. Each shows the comparison, what was measured, the direction the paper reports and, where the index holds it, the sentence it was read from. A check is kept with the ORCID iD it was made under and the time it was made.