Results quoted from your papers
Are these right?
OpenAgData quotes measured results from papers so that a reader can see what was tested, what was measured and which way it went. These is the result drawn from your paper. You measured them; nobody is better placed to say whether we read them correctly.
Mark a result Right and it is shown as confirmed by its author. Mark it Not right and it comes off the public page until it has been corrected from the paper.
Opened without an author's link. What you mark goes to a reviewer first.How Much Is Enough? Minimal Responses of Water Quality and Stream Biota to Partial Retrofit Stormwater Management in a Suburban Neighborhood
2014 · 1 result quoted
parcel-scale stormwater retrofits (rain barrels and rain gardens) vs pre-treatment condition
directly connected impervious areaLower1.2 %
“Given the minor reductions in directly connected impervious area from the rain barrel installations (11.6% to 10.4% in the most impaired subcatchment) and high total impervious levels (13.1% to 19.9% in experimental subcatchments), we expected minor or no responses of water quality and biota to stormwater management.” abstract
This page was opened without an author's link, so what you mark here goes to a reviewer first and changes nothing on the public page until they have looked.
These are the results the index extracted from each paper's text. Each shows the comparison, what was measured, the direction the paper reports and, where the index holds it, the sentence it was read from. A check is kept with the ORCID iD it was made under and the time it was made.