Results quoted from your papers
Are these right?
OpenAgData quotes measured results from papers so that a reader can see what was tested, what was measured and which way it went. These are the 2 results drawn from your paper. You measured them; nobody is better placed to say whether we read them correctly.
Mark a result Right and it is shown as confirmed by its author. Mark it Not right and it comes off the public page until it has been corrected from the paper.
Opened without an author's link. What you mark goes to a reviewer first.Analysis of Best Management Practices Implementation on Water Quality Using the Soil and Water Assessment Tool
2016 · 2 results quoted
cover crop (rye) vs no BMP
nitrate load reduction · rye cover cropLower54.5 %
“the usage of rye as cover crop performed the best in reducing nitrate discharge from the watershed as a single BMP, with an average annual nitrate load reduction of 54.5%.” abstract
no tillage + rye cover crop vs rye cover crop with conventional tillage
nitrate discharge reduction · rye cover cropLower60.5 %
“Combining no tillage and rye cover crops had varying results over the period simulated, but the average nitrate reduction was better than using rye cover crops with conventional tillage, with the average annual nitrate discharge decreased by 60.5% (an improvement of 13% over rye only).” abstract
This page was opened without an author's link, so what you mark here goes to a reviewer first and changes nothing on the public page until they have looked.
These are the results the index extracted from each paper's text. Each shows the comparison, what was measured, the direction the paper reports and, where the index holds it, the sentence it was read from. A check is kept with the ORCID iD it was made under and the time it was made.