Results quoted from your papers
Are these right?
OpenAgData quotes measured results from papers so that a reader can see what was tested, what was measured and which way it went. These are the 5 results drawn from your paper. You measured them; nobody is better placed to say whether we read them correctly.
Mark a result Right and it is shown as confirmed by its author. Mark it Not right and it comes off the public page until it has been corrected from the paper.
Opened without an author's link. What you mark goes to a reviewer first.Benchmarking impact of nitrogen inputs on grain yield and environmental performance of producer fields in the western US Corn Belt
2020 · 5 results quoted
crop rotation (maize-soybean vs continuous maize) vs continuous maize
N balance · maizeLower
“Nitrogen balance was smaller for maize crops following soybean compared to continuous maize.” abstract
irrigation vs rainfed fields
grain yield · maizeHigher40 %
“Average yield and N inputs were 40 and 44% higher in irrigated versus rainfed fields.” abstract
irrigation vs rainfed fields
N balance · maizeHigher2 ratio
“The N balance was ca. 2-fold greater in irrigated versus rainfed fields (81 versus 41 kg N ha−1).” abstract
irrigation vs rainfed fields
N inputs · maizeHigher44 %
“Average yield and N inputs were 40 and 44% higher in irrigated versus rainfed fields.” abstract
irrigation vs rainfed fields
yield-scaled N balance · maizeLower
“Despite the larger N balance (on an area basis), irrigated fields exhibited smaller yield-scaled N balance relative to rainfed fields.” abstract
This page was opened without an author's link, so what you mark here goes to a reviewer first and changes nothing on the public page until they have looked.
These are the results the index extracted from each paper's text. Each shows the comparison, what was measured, the direction the paper reports and, where the index holds it, the sentence it was read from. A check is kept with the ORCID iD it was made under and the time it was made.