Results quoted from your papers
Are these right?
OpenAgData quotes measured results from papers so that a reader can see what was tested, what was measured and which way it went. These are the 14 results drawn from your paper. You measured them; nobody is better placed to say whether we read them correctly.
Mark a result Right and it is shown as confirmed by its author. Mark it Not right and it comes off the public page until it has been corrected from the paper.
Opened without an author's link. What you mark goes to a reviewer first.Intermediate wheatgrass as a dual use crop for grain and grazing
2025 · 14 results quoted
dual use IWG (grazed regrowth), realized experimental forage yield vs grain+straw only IWG (ungrazed), potential experimental forage yield
experimental forage yield of fall regrowth and spring growth · intermediate wheatgrassNo change
“Contrary to the hypothesis, no differences between agronomic systems were observed for the experimental forage yield in fall ( p = 0.39) or spring ( p = 0.07).” results
dual use IWG enterprise: grain+straw+grazed forage (farmer budget 2018-2021) vs grain-only IWG enterprise (GR, straw not marketed), farmer budget 2018-2021
net return to the enterprise, annualized including establishment year · intermediate wheatgrassHigher609 against 262 $ ha−1 yr−1
“Yet, the mean estimated net return to the enterprise for the DU system was $112 ha -1 yr -1 less than in the GP system but $347 ha -1 yr -1 greater than for the GR system ( Table 2 ).” results
dual use IWG enterprise: grain+straw+grazed forage (farmer budget 2018-2021) vs grain+straw IWG enterprise (GP), farmer budget 2018-2021
net return to the enterprise, annualized including establishment year · intermediate wheatgrassLower609 against 721 $ ha−1 yr−1
“The sale of higher year 2 grain yields in the GP system led to this system earning a net return to the enterprise of $721 ha -1 yr -1 with the DU system producing $609 ha -1 yr -1 .” abstract
dual use IWG: grain+straw harvest plus fall and spring grazing (stand year 2) vs grain+straw only IWG, ungrazed exclosure (GP)
experimental straw yield, stand year 2 · intermediate wheatgrassLower-3.8 Mg ha−1
“The DU system produced 3.8 Mg ha -1 less experimental straw than the GP system in year 2 ( p < 0.0001) but similar experimental straw yields of approximately 5 Mg ha -1 were observed in both agronomic systems in year 3 ( p = 0.49).” results
dual use IWG: grain+straw harvest plus fall and spring grazing (stand year 3, 2020-2021) vs grain+straw only IWG, ungrazed exclosure (GP)
experimental grain yield, stand year 3 · intermediate wheatgrassNo change
“In year 3, the experimental grain yield was similar among agronomic systems ( p = 0.44).” results
dual use IWG: grain+straw harvest plus fall and spring grazing (stand year 3, spring) vs grain+straw only IWG, ungrazed exclosure (GP)
relative feed value of spring forage, stand year 3 · intermediate wheatgrassHigher21 RFV units
“No differences in RFV were observed among agronomic systems, except for in the spring of year 3 ( p < 0.01) when the RFV of spring forage in the DU system was 21 units greater than in the GP system.” results
dual use IWG: grain+straw harvest plus fall and spring grazing (stand year 3) vs grain+straw only IWG, ungrazed exclosure (GP)
experimental straw yield, stand year 3 · intermediate wheatgrassNo change5 Mg ha−1 (approximate, both systems)
“The DU system produced 3.8 Mg ha -1 less experimental straw than the GP system in year 2 ( p < 0.0001) but similar experimental straw yields of approximately 5 Mg ha -1 were observed in both agronomic systems in year 3 ( p = 0.49).” results
dual use IWG: grain+straw harvest plus fall and spring grazing (stand year 4, 2021-2022) vs grain+straw only IWG, ungrazed exclosure (GP)
experimental grain yield, stand year 4 · intermediate wheatgrassHigher27 %
“In year 4, the experimental grain yield was greater in the DU system than in the GP system ( p = 0.04). Specifically, the DU system yielded 533 kg ha -1 , or 27% more grain than the GP system.” results
dual use IWG: grain+straw harvest plus fall and spring grazing, stand years 2-3 vs grain+straw only IWG, ungrazed exclosure (GP)
experimental straw yield across two study years · intermediate wheatgrassLower-29 %
“Overall, the DU system produced 29% less experimental straw than the GP system across the two study years, due to lower year 2 experimental straw yield.” results
dual use IWG: grain+straw harvest plus fall and spring grazing, stand years 2-3 vs grain+straw only IWG, ungrazed exclosure (GP)
harvest index (grain / (grain + straw)) · intermediate wheatgrassNo change0.15 ratio (mean across systems and years)
“No differences in harvest index were observed between the GP and DU systems in years 2 or 3 ( p = 0.10). The harvest index averaged across agronomic systems and stand ages was 0.15 ( Figure 2c ).” results
dual use IWG: grain+straw harvest plus fall and spring grazing, stand years 2-4 summed vs grain+straw only IWG, ungrazed exclosure (GP)
total experimental grain yield over three production years · intermediate wheatgrassLower1,822 against 2,081 kg ha−1 (3-yr total)
“However, overall, the DU system produced 14% less total experimental grain (1,822 kg ha -1 ) than the GP system (2,081 kg ha -1 ).” results
dual use IWG: summer grain+straw harvest plus fall and spring cattle grazing of regrowth (stand year 2, 2019-2020) vs grain+straw only IWG, ungrazed exclosure (GP)
experimental grain yield (hand-harvested quadrat), stand year 2 · intermediate wheatgrassLower710 against 1,010 kg ha−1
“In year 2, a greater experimental grain yield ( p < 0.01) was observed in the GP system (1,010 kg ha -1 ) than in the DU system (710 kg ha -1 ; Figure 2a ).” results
fall grazing of IWG regrowth (October/November), stand year 3 vs spring grazing of IWG growth (May), stand year 3
herbage intake by grazing cattle · intermediate wheatgrassLower2.29 against 0.11 Mg ha−1
“In year 3, the HI declined 95% from 2.29 Mg ha -1 in the fall to 0.11 Mg ha -1 in the spring ( Figure 4a ).” results
fall grazing of IWG regrowth, stand year 3 vs spring grazing of IWG growth, stand year 3
forage utilization (herbage intake / pre-graze biomass) · intermediate wheatgrassHigher92 against 12 %
“Specifically, the difference between the fall FU (92%) and spring FU (12%) in year 3 ( p < 0.0001) drove this result and provided evidence in support of hypothesis #3.” results
This page was opened without an author's link, so what you mark here goes to a reviewer first and changes nothing on the public page until they have looked.
These are the results the index extracted from each paper's text. Each shows the comparison, what was measured, the direction the paper reports and, where the index holds it, the sentence it was read from. A check is kept with the ORCID iD it was made under and the time it was made.